White House's Shocking Move: How a New Website Aims to Expose MEDIA Bias – You Won't Believe the Details!

The White House has taken a controversial step by launching a new section on its official website aimed at publicly criticizing media organizations and journalists it claims have misrepresented facts. This initiative, introduced on Friday, features a banner declaring “Misleading. Biased. Exposed.” and highlights specific outlets and individuals labeled as “media offenders of the week.” Among those named are the Boston Globe, CBS News, and the Independent, accused of distorting President Donald Trump's comments regarding six Democratic lawmakers who released a video advising military personnel against following illegal orders.

The tensions escalated when Trump accused the Democrats of engaging in “seditious behavior, punishable by death,” a remark that has drawn significant backlash. He further inflamed the situation by reposting a message that included the phrase “hang them.” The White House's response states, “The Democrats and Fake News Media subversively implied that President Trump had issued illegal orders to service members. Every order President Trump has issued has been lawful. It is dangerous for sitting Members of Congress to incite insubordination in the United States’ military, and President Trump called for them to be held accountable.”

The new online feature includes an “Offender Hall of Shame,” spotlighting major news outlets such as the Washington Post, CBS News, CNN, and MSNBC, which is now branded as MS Now. Users can explore a searchable database of articles, along with the names of the journalists who wrote them. Each story is categorized under labels including “bias,” “malpractice,” or “left wing lunacy.” Currently, the Washington Post sits atop the leaderboard as the top offender, followed by MSNBC and CBS News.

Among the flagged articles from the Washington Post is a recent report illustrating the U.S. Coast Guard's decision to cease classifying swastikas and nooses as hate symbols; this decision was reversed swiftly after the article's publication. The Post acknowledged this reversal in a follow-up piece, quoting an internal spokesperson who stated, “The Washington Post is proud of its accurate, rigorous journalism.”

In addition to the specific offenders, the White House webpage includes a lengthy list of other major news organizations it accuses of bias and misinformation, such as the Associated Press, New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Politico, and Axios.

This new webpage represents yet another escalation in Trump's longstanding campaign against the media, following a pattern of lawsuits against the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times, as well as legal settlements with ABC and CBS. Trump's repeated declarations of major news outlets as the “enemy of the people” underscore the ongoing tensions between his administration and the press.

In recent weeks, Trump's rhetoric has increasingly targeted female journalists. Earlier this month, he referred to a Bloomberg News correspondent as “a piggy” during an encounter on Air Force One, after being questioned about the Epstein files. Just days later, he labeled an ABC News reporter a “terrible person” when confronted regarding the murder of Jamal Khashoggi and issues surrounding the Epstein scandal. More recently, Trump criticized a New York Times correspondent in a Truth Social post, calling her “a third rate reporter who is ugly, both inside and out,” following an article speculating on his energy levels as he approaches 80.

This new approach to cataloging perceived media bias raises questions about the implications for journalism and the public's trust in news sources. As the White House amplifies its critique of the media, it highlights a growing divide between governmental narratives and journalistic integrity, posing a challenge to the traditional role of the press in American democracy.