Joe Rogan’s SHOCKING Take on Trump’s UFC Showdown: Is the White House at Risk? Don’t Miss This!

Former President **Donald Trump** recently proposed a striking idea to commemorate America’s 250th birthday: hosting a massive **UFC fight card** on the **White House lawn**. Scheduled for **June 14, 2026**, this ambitious event is set to take place in **Washington, D.C.** and is expected to feature “eight or nine championship fights,” according to Trump. The former president claims that the event could attract a crowd of up to **100,000 fans**. However, reactions have been mixed, with notable skepticism coming from influential **UFC commentator Joe Rogan**.

During a recent episode of **The Joe Rogan Experience**, Rogan, known for his extensive knowledge of mixed martial arts, scrutinized Trump’s proposal. He pointed out a significant inconsistency in the plan, highlighting that there are only **eight weight classes** in the UFC. “How are they going to have nine title fights?” he asked, questioning the logistics of the event. This reflects a broader concern about the feasibility of Trump’s vision.

Rogan further raised alarms about the potential security challenges associated with hosting such a large event at the White House. He bluntly questioned, “What kind of security are they going to have?” With the possibility of **100,000 attendees**, the logistics of ensuring safety become increasingly daunting. When discussing the idea of fighting in front of such a large crowd, UFC fighter **Brendan Allen**, who was also on the podcast, expressed his reluctance, stating, “Not really,” in response to Rogan’s inquiry about whether he would want to fight in that setting. Rogan added humorously that the pressure of fighting under those circumstances would be “strange,” given the various rules and distractions.

Weather conditions also emerged as a significant concern in Rogan’s critique. June in **Washington, D.C.** can be sweltering, with temperatures often exceeding **90 degrees** Fahrenheit. Rogan asked, “What if it’s 98 degrees?” and cited the draining effects of heat and humidity on athletes. He recounted an experience from **Louisiana**, where he witnessed outdoor fights and noted that fighters struggled due to the oppressive conditions. “You could cut that air,” he remarked, agreeing that the weather could ruin the fights.

As Trump's public persona continues to captivate and polarize, Rogan’s commentary serves as a reminder that even the most ambitious ideas need to address practical realities. While plans for the White House UFC event are still in their infancy, doubts from someone as prominent in the UFC community as Rogan highlight the complexities involved in organizing such a large-scale sporting event.

Beyond the logistics, this proposal opens up discussions about the intersection of politics and sports, particularly in a time when the cultural landscape is already fraught with division. Trump's administration often blurred the lines between the two, and this idea seems to follow that trend. Whether the UFC event will become a reality or remain a talking point will depend on many factors, including regulatory approvals, public interest, and logistical feasibility.

As of now, with voices like Joe Rogan raising valid concerns, it remains to be seen how this bold proposal will evolve. Trump’s vision for a historic celebration at the White House may be ambitious, but the questions surrounding safety, feasibility, and practicality demand thoughtful consideration.