Megyn Kelly vs. Mark Levin: Social Media Feud Escalates—Is Someone's Life in Danger?

The ongoing public feud between conservative commentators Mark Levin and Megyn Kelly continues to escalate, capturing the attention of media and political observers alike. The clash erupted following Kelly's defense of fellow commentator Tucker Carlson, who has faced scrutiny over his controversial ties to far-right figures, including Nick Fuentes.
Levin, a prominent radio host and author, shifted his focus to Kelly, accusing her of engaging in similar behavior to Carlson. His comments, which included accusations of platforming Fuentes, prompted Kelly to respond, labelling Levin's statements as “dangerous,” especially in the aftermath of recent threats against political figures, including a chilling assassination attempt on Charlie Kirk.
Recent developments have seen Kelly alleging that Levin referred to her as a “Nazi.” In denying this accusation, Levin remarked, “You’re awfully defensive. Serial lying is not a great trait, Megyn. But you are a crackpot.” This exchange heightened tensions further, with Kelly firing back on social media, asserting, “You absolutely did (call me a Nazi) you lying (piece of expletive), Mark Levin. You won’t be happy until you get someone killed.”
In a follow-up, Levin clarified that his comments were directed at Kelly’s integrity, branding her a “grifter” instead. He stated, “No, no Megyn, I was calling you a grifter. You’ve revealed yourself. You also have the mouth of a lowlife. Very limited vocabulary. You should work on that.” He continued to criticize her past comments regarding the victims of Jeffrey Epstein, which he claimed have resulted in widespread condemnation against her.
As the back-and-forth intensifies, Kelly has refrained from responding to Levin's most recent statements. In an interesting twist, Levin circulated a video clip from a past interview where Kelly shared her admiration for him, admitting to having “a crush from afar.” This revelation added another layer to their public dispute, showcasing the complicated dynamics of personal sentiment intertwined with professional rivalry.
This ongoing feud not only underscores the contentious landscape of American political commentary but also highlights the broader implications of media responsibility and the impact of inflammatory rhetoric in an already polarized environment. As both figures continue to engage in this high-profile dispute, it raises critical questions about the role of media personalities in shaping public discourse and the responsibilities that come with their influential platforms.
For regular updates on the evolving media landscape, including daily news on the music, news, and sports industries, readers can subscribe to newsletters from outlets such as Barrett Media.
You might also like: