Democratic AGs Issue URGENT Warning: Are You Prepared for the 2026 Election Battle? Shocking Details Inside!

As the midterm elections loom, a coalition of five Democratic attorneys general made a bold declaration in Portland, Oregon: their legal battles against the Trump administration are far from over. Speaking at a town hall event on Wednesday, Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield emphasized their commitment to fighting for democratic rights and civil liberties. “There is no way in hell we are going to let this president continue to chip away at our rights, at our democracy at this time,” Rayfield told an engaged audience of hundreds. “We’re going to continue to fight for this entire term and do our job as attorneys general.”

Joining Rayfield were his counterparts from California, Rob Bonta; Hawaii, Anne Lopez; Maine, Aaron Frey; and Minnesota, Keith Ellison. The event, moderated by writer Cheryl Strayed, served as a platform to discuss their ongoing response to what they describe as federal overreach by President Trump’s administration.

This town hall marked the one-year anniversary of Oregon signing onto its first federal lawsuit against the Trump administration, which included several states in a suit aimed at preventing the end of birthright citizenship. Constituents raised pressing concerns regarding potential threats to funding for essential services like childcare, abortion rights, and civil rights protections amid increasing federal scrutiny.

Ellison highlighted the pressing issue of election integrity, stating, “We’re all considering the issue of election integrity ahead of the 2026 midterm season.” This concern is particularly relevant as Democrats may see a resurgence in light of an unpopular Republican-controlled White House and Congress, as well as recent favorable special election outcomes.

Adding to the gravity of the situation, the U.S. Department of Justice has sued over 20 states for unredacted access to voter rolls. A federal judge in Oregon recently indicated intentions to block the federal government from accessing sensitive personal data for over 3 million voters in the state, including driver’s license numbers and partial Social Security numbers.

“We’re very well aware that it is an election year midterm, and that everybody’s reading the polls,” Ellison noted. “Some folks want to forestall the voter’s will.” The attorneys general took a hard stance, asserting their legal actions have secured billions in funding and safeguarded civil rights for constituents while urging their Republican counterparts to join their efforts.

Bonta succinctly summarized their approach: “Donald Trump decides when and if we will sue him. If he breaks the law, we sue. If he doesn’t break the law, we don’t sue. It’s really that simple.” Since Trump took office, Oregon has filed over 50 lawsuits against the administration, collaborating with other Democratic-led states to block funding cuts that disproportionately affect vulnerable communities.

These legal strategies have led to the preservation of billions designated for crucial programs, including those focused on electric vehicle infrastructure and education for low-income and unhoused students. Notably, Oregon successfully secured a court order to block Trump’s attempted deployment of the National Guard to Portland, though the case remains under appeal.

Ellison expressed particular concern about the federal government’s aggressive immigration enforcement tactics in Minnesota, where the Trump administration has deployed over 3,500 immigration agents. He described this as an excessive force scenario that creates a hostile atmosphere for a wide range of residents. “They’re standing outside of grocery stores, demanding people show their papers, whether they are citizens or not,” he stated, underscoring the disproportionate impact of federal actions on everyday life.

Investigating Federal Force

In addition to their broader legal battles, Rayfield and Ellison recently initiated independent investigations into federal shootings involving U.S. Department of Homeland Security agents. Despite significant protections for these agents under an 1890 Supreme Court precedent, legal experts suggest these protections may not apply when actions exceed their authority.

In Oregon, recent incidents include U.S. Border Patrol shooting two Venezuelan nationals, leading Rayfield to investigate the actions of federal agents. In Minnesota, an ICE officer fatally shot a U.S. citizen, Renee Nicole Good, prompting local prosecutors to open a public portal for evidence submissions after the federal government effectively sidelined them from the investigation.

This situation has led to accusations that the federal government is deflecting scrutiny away from its agents while targeting political adversaries. Ellison confirmed he received a subpoena concerning the investigation but refrained from commenting on its implications, instead expressing concern over the lack of accountability for federal actions, stating, “It is disturbing that they’re not even investigating at all.”

Both attorneys general concluded their remarks by urging citizens to remain vigilant and involved, stressing that collective action and transparency are vital for holding the federal government accountable. “Ultimately, this country will be saved by the people of the United States,” Ellison urged, “and so that means you’re protesting, you’re gathering evidence, you’re sharing with us.”

The commitment of these attorneys general to challenge federal policies underscores a significant chapter in the ongoing struggle for civil rights and community protection in the U.S. As midterm elections approach, their coordinated efforts highlight the pressing intersection of law and politics in safeguarding democratic values.